Mitigating IP Risk: Three Strategies to Ensure Open Source Compliance

Irresponsible usage of open source could result in litigation risk, lowered valuation, loss of market opportunity, and damaged reputation which could impact sales and the recruitment of top talent.

Three approaches to mitigating risk in using open source include manual audits, semi-automated compliance, and continuous compliance. There are pros and cons to each approach, but continuous compliance fits best for companies leveraging agile development methodologies, DevOps, and CI/CD technology tools.

Mitigating IP Risk: Three Strategies to Ensure Open Source Compliance discusses:

Different types of risks associated with open source licenses

Top approaches to mitigating risk in open source

Pros and cons of manual open source audits

Contrasts between semi-automated and continuous compliance

Emerging trends in mitigating open-source risk


Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for security management, license compliance, and code quality across the open source stack. With FOSSA, engineering, security, and legal teams all get

complete and continuous risk mitigation for the entire software supply chain, integrated into each of their existing workflows. FOSSA enables organizations like Uber, Zendesk, Twitter, Verizon, Fitbit, and UiPath to manage their open source at scale and drive continuous innovation.

Use Cases

Risk Mitigation

FOSSA users benchmark 47% fewer false-positives by finding dependencies they actually rely on earlier in the SDLC.

Continuous Compliance

Get 90% faster insight in your CI/CD workflows — an average of four weeks shorter compliance implementation time.

Due Diligence

Only FOSSA delivers the most complete open source audit for IPOs and M&As plus 5% annualized engineering savings in the first week alone.